Background Image
Previous Page  30 / 100 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 30 / 100 Next Page
Page Background

30

// PUBLIC GAMING INTERNATIONAL // September/October 2016

for these first launches to be successful, not

only for the individual states, but for the

industry as a whole. There were more than

a few iGaming opponents who said you

couldn’t do reliable geolocation, couldn’t

do proper player identification, couldn’t do

safe payment processing, etc. Any slip-up

had the potential to set-back iGaming who

knows how long. But Delaware, along with

the other jurisdictions, have had no seri-

ous or significant operational or integrity

issues since their respective launches. No

cheating scandals, and no underage play-

ers or players from outside state boundar-

ies. To your point, I have been on several

panels with Nevada and NJ and we always

get asked about revenue and we all reply

in the same manner. The question should

be does it work, not are you disappointed

in how much revenue you are generating.

Delaware has now turned its attention to

player acquisition with more targeted mar-

keting. Having established a strong and

reliable operational platform, we are now

able to focus even more on the revenue-

building component. I think the results are

really beginning to show, with a 93% year-

over-year increase for the first six months of

2016 versus the same period last year.

Does your experience indicate that there is

much cross-over between players who play

lottery at retail stores, those who buy online,

those who play casino-style games online, and

those who play in land-based casinos? 

V. Kirk:

We have no direct evidence that

players migrate between traditional lottery

customers and iGaming, or even land based

casino customers and iGaming. Questions

relating to consumer play-styles and behav-

ior will be part of a player’s survey that’s

being planned now.

Do your promotional strategies facilitate and

encourage consumers to go to different chan-

nels and try different game-styles? 

V. Kirk:

Yes, we have tried to promote

exactly that. For example, the casinos have

poker tournaments that start on-line and

finish with live tables at the casino. Also,

coupons and other giveaways are awarded

online and redeemed at the brick and mor-

tar facility, and visa/versa.

Is there anything that promotes Lottery to ca-

sino and i-gaming players?

V. Kirk:

We have not found much of a

market for cross-over between our tradi-

tional game Lottery players to the casinos

and we are currently not well positioned to

encompass the same to iGaming. We have

tried various types of casino promotions

such as selling NASCAR instant tickets in

conjunction with races at Dover Downs,

but with modest success.  We have had

success cross promoting our Sports Lot-

tery with casino gaming with such things

as buy a Sports Lottery ticket of a certain

value and receive a match-play coupon for

table games (i.e. blackjack, roulette, craps,

etc.). Our Vegas style iGaming is more dif-

ficult to coordinate with our traditional

products, but when we get to the stage

where we will be selling our traditional

products online, I’m confident we will be

able to find ways to promote to both types

of players as they will both be familiar

with the genre.  For example, some online

loyalty programs offer game play and that

could serve as an introduction and transi-

tion to our iGaming platform.

What have you learned about player behavior

that has surprised you, or that you did not

know five years ago?

V. Kirk:

We have a large contingent of

young players online. That is not surprising

in and of itself, but a large number of them

are young women, and that has been a bit

surprising for me. They are very loyal and

enthusiastic players, especially on certain

virtual video lottery games.

Why not sell traditional lottery products online?

V. Kirk:

We definitely will, but our

Agency is very small and we have had a

lot on our plate. Going back to the Dela-

ware Gaming and Competitiveness Act of

2012, we were authorized to expand our

Sports Lottery from the 3 casinos to in-

clude retailer locations. We did that first so

that we could launch in time for the 2012

professional football season. We were also

authorized to start Keno, which was num-

ber two on our agenda, and we successfully

launched in January 2013. We then turned

our attention to iGaming and what I call

eLottery (traditional products online). We

had thought we may be able to do them

in parallel, but that proved way too ambi-

tious, so we made the business decision to

do iGaming first. We launched iGaming

in late October 2013. Then, in February

2014, the Governors of Delaware and Ne-

vada signed the Multi-State Internet Gam-

ing Agreement, the first of its kind in the

nation. This agreement allowed for the two

states to share poker liquidity where players

from both states could sit down at a virtual

poker table and play against one another.

We added mobile for iGaming in May and

then were tasked with establishing lim-

ited video lottery in fraternal organizations

throughout the state. As soon as we catch

our breath, we will look toward eLottery!

How has development of online gaming im-

pacted traditional lottery revenues? 

V. Kirk:

We have seen no impact on our

traditional lottery revenue. FY13-15 were

all record years in traditional sales for us

(2015: $149.7 million; 2014: $148.3;

2013: $144.1). Then we shattered the re-

cord in FY16 with $175.0 million. All of

Delaware’s products were up, but the pri-

mary reasons for the increase were the re-

surgence of Powerball (up 45%) and the

continued success of our instant games (up

21%, in part fueled by our first $25 price

point game).

What do you do to maintain growth in the tra-

ditional lottery sector in the face of increased

consumer options for recreational gaming?

V. Kirk:

Like many if not most, our tra-

ditional lottery growth has come from in-

stant scratch-off games. We have focused

on value in all price points and introduced

our highest ($25 per ticket) just a few

months ago and it became the first instant

game the Lottery ever re-ordered.

 It appears to be the case that the DE legisla-

ture will not legalize Daily Fantasy Sports?

Do you think that might change? How do you

think the Fantasy Sports phenomenon will

impact the broader games of chance space,

and lottery in particular—not just in DE but

across the country?

Continued on page 91