Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  65 / 76 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 65 / 76 Next Page
Page Background

May/June 2016 // PUBLIC GAMING INTERNATIONAL //

65

expanding the portfolio of games and price-

points. Some states now have $50 instant

tickets. The instant ticket category has an

incredibly wide variety of play-styles and

price-points to appeal to all types of players.

The draw-based games have not been

growing nearly as much as instant ticket

sales over the past 20 years. We believe

that one reason for that is simply the lack

of variety, lack of price-point and value-

proposition options for the consumer.

Mega Millions and Powerball provide a

player experience that is quite similar and

they offer just two price points - $1 and $2

tickets. We would like to create a platform

for expanding the portfolio of draw-based

games, and give the consumer the option

to buy higher-priced tickets, perhaps with

different value propositions. We feel there

is a market for those options and would

like to give the consumer those choices. To

do that, we need the scale and liquidity of a

nationwide population base.

Getting the broad consensus for doing a

nationwide game is challenging. If a game

can be done on a regional basis, it should

be done on a regional basis because it is

easier for three or four or five or even ten

state lotteries to agree on a game’s param-

eters than it is for forty four lotteries to

agree on everything. Regional games pro-

vide a fabulous platform for games that are

hard to implement by an individual state

lottery. Likewise, there are games that will

perform much better if we can get an even

larger number of lotteries to collaborate

and implement them.

Does the national premium game have to be a

draw-based game?

R. Hargrove:

It doesn’t necessarily have

to be a draw-based game but it has to be

a value proposition that the player is will-

ing to pay a higher ticket price for. The first

thing I say at every national premium game

meeting is there’s no point in doing it to-

gether if we can do it alone. And there’s no

point in doing it with forty four states if it

can be done with six states. Instant games

do not require the high population base that

draw-games depend on. And it is important

that we figure out how to drive growth in

the draw-based games because they deliver

higher profit margins than instants tickets.

Why not just scale up the regional games and

expand, adding states and building liquidity

along the way?

R. Hargrove:

Regional games can scale

up as you suggest. For example, a number

of state lotteries now offer the Lucky for

Life game, which has a 60% prize payout.

New York can’t do a 60% payout. It wanted

to do the same kind of a game, but with a

55% payout. So New York and New Jersey

created Cash4Life, which pays out 55%.

Those states that like the game and can

pay out 60% joined the Lucky for Life re-

gional game. And those states that want a

55% game joined Cash4Life. Both are great

games. But neither could scale up to nation-

al scale because some states prefer a 60%

payout while others want a 55% payout.

And since they both work well on a regional

basis, why not run both games and just al-

low each state to choose which one works

best for them and their state regulations?

It is not an either/or question. Regional

games are great. We just want to explore

all possibilities for expanding the port-

folio of multi-state games. And there are

some game concepts that work better with

maximum liquidity and participation of

the largest number of state lotteries.

The World Lottery Association (WLA) plays

such an important role on the global stage of

government lotteries. Why should U.S. lotter-

ies become more involved in the WLA?

R. Hargrove:

I think it’s important for

all lotteries to be part of the global com-

munity because there’s so much we can

learn from each other. That is particularly

true for U.S. lotteries, which are less ma-

ture than many other lotteries around the

world. And the responsible gaming plat-

forms that have been developed by WLA

are more important than ever now that lot-

teries are moving into internet wagering.

U.S. lotteries learn from each other and

from the analyses of game performance in

different states. By the same token, we could

benefit immensely by studying the experi-

ences of lotteries in Europe, Australia, South

America, and other markets around the

world. That would expose us to a much big-

ger variety of new games than we see in the

U.S. That is also true for multi-jurisdictional

games where regions are making them work

across completely different gaming cultures,

monetary systems, and languages. Some of

these lotteries have been operating for over

200 years. And South and Latin America are

advancing in Mobile and Social gaming in

ways that everyone can learn from. There is

practically no issue that we face in the U.S.

that has not been dealt with by other lotter-

ies around the world.

Many parts of the Asian-Pacific region,

China and Korea, are in the early stages of

developing their own lotteries and regula-

tory models. As the games-of-chance in-

dustry becomes global, it is important the

U.S. join with other lotteries to shape the

global industry in ways that will serve the

interests of governments and good causes.

Sports betting has been on the global

stage for many years. And now Daily Fan-

tasy Sports has put it on the radar of every-

one in the U.S. games-of-chance industry.

The WLA Global Lottery Monitoring Sys-

tem (GLMS) is tracking the issue of pre-

serving integrity in sports betting from the

only angle that works—engaging the entire

international community of regulators and

operators. It’s a fabulous program put to-

gether by WLA president Jean-Luc Moner-

Banet and others, and I certainly applaud

their efforts.

The WLA recently held an iLottery sem-

inar in New York that was very well attend-

ed and everyone thought it was fabulous.

The presenters were from lotteries that

have been selling lottery products online

for many years. There is a lot we can learn

from them. WLA seminars are conducted

all over the world and always receive rave

reviews from the participants.

So, yes, let’s engage with our colleagues

in the global community of government-

lottery operators. The WLA is the perfect

vehicle to connect us to our colleagues all

around the world!