Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  18 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 18 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

Barring any additional fallout from the scan-

dals around Daily Fantasy Sports (DFS) that

emerged earlier this month, the proportion of

U.S. adults who play on sites such as FanDuel.

com and

DraftKings.com

during the NFL 2015-

16 season could soon rival those who play in

traditional Fantasy Football leagues. In a new

poll released by Leger, The Research Intelligence

Group, 15% of U.S. Adults claim to have played

on DFS sites such as DraftKings or FanDuel this

season, narrowly behind the 17% who report

playing in a regular, traditional Fantasy Football

(FF) league (such as those played on

NFL.com

,

Yahoo,

ESPN.com

, etc.) this season.

“The onslaught of advertising by both FanDu-

el and DraftKings seems to be paying off in both

DFS brand awareness as well as participation,”

said Lance Henik, Senior Account Manager at

Leger. “Moreover, the results of our latest poll

show that room for growth in DFS participation

continues to exist, despite the controversy around

the ‘Coke and Pepsi’ of the DFS Industry reach-

ing new heights this October.”

According to the 2006Unlawful Internet Gam-

bling Enforcement Act (UIGEA), a law that was

designed to prevent gambling over the Internet,

DFS was clarified to be a game of skill and there-

fore is not considered gambling. Despite this, the

Leger October 2015 poll shows more than one in

four (28%) adults overall consider DFS play at

sites such as DraftKings or FanDuel, as gambling.

The perception of Daily Fantasy Sports as gam-

bling increases dramatically among DFS players,

as more than four in five (85%) who play DFS

overall consider their participation as gambling.

Perhaps more surprising is the fact that a signifi-

cantly higher proportion of adults overall (39%)

consider ‘regular’ Fantasy Sports (such as Fantasy

Football, Fantasy Baseball, etc.) as gambling when

compared to the daily version. “The general knowl-

edge and experience, direct or otherwise, around

the ‘traditional’ Fantasy Football league casts a

wider net than DFS,” said Henik. “While players

of Fantasy Football and/or DFS consider either

activity as gambling; there are also more conversa-

tions witnessed among colleagues, friends, family,

etc., around Fantasy Football leagues thanDFS, the

latter of which tends to be an individual activity.”

Public perception around DFS seems to be

impacted by the employee betting scandal un-

covered this month that prompted investiga-

tions from the New York Attorney General and

the FBI. Overall, 40% of US adults do not think

employees of companies that run daily or weekly

fantasy sports websites such as FanDuel or Draft-

Kings should be allowed to play daily/weekly fan-

tasy games, with another quarter (24%) unsure.

This is in direct contrast with the perception

of DFS among its players. According to the Leger

October 2015 poll, nearly three-quarters (73%)

DFS players think employees of these companies

should be allowed to play daily/weekly fantasy

games. Furthermore, nearly half (45%) think

employees should be allowed to play regardless

of whether they are employed by the same site

(28% think they should be allowed to play, but

at a different site). “By and large, DFS players are

seemingly unmoved by this scandal,” said Henik.

“Despite reports of fewer DFS entry fees over the

past few weeks, the impact on play is nowhere

near the extent experienced by the online poker

sites a few years ago, at least in the short term.”

Further illustrating the strength of DFS play

in spite of the scandal this month is the room for

growth that still exists for new DFS players this

season. According to Leger, 9% of current non-

players claim they are either “extremely likely,” or

“very likely” to play on a DFS site such as FanDuel

or DraftKings this season, with 4% stating ‘ex-

tremely likely.’ If this increase in player penetration

happens, DFS play could well surpass convention-

al FF league play by the end of the NFL season.

However, the barriers to DFS entry are start-

ing to form. The state of Nevada ruled last week

that participation in DFS falls into the state’s

definition of gambling, joining Arizona, Iowa,

Louisiana, Montana and Washington as states

that prohibit this activity. Around the same time,

the NCAA notified executives from DraftKings

and FanDuel it has banned advertising from the

two sites during NCAA championship events,

citing its long-standing advertising policy against

sports wagering entities.

Regardless, play of both regular fantasy football

and DFS is at 28% for both forms among young-

er Millennials (18–29 year olds). However, a gap

exists between the older Millennial/younger Gen-

eration X group, those between 30–39 years age,

who played DFS (26%) and playing FF (30%).

Finally, Leger’s research also shows that poten-

tial players aged 30–39 are more than four times

as likely as their younger peers to cite a strong

likelihood (top box % intent) to play DFS this

season. With this in mind, where pundits may

have believed the younger Millennials represent

any growth in DFS play for the rest of the NFL

season, it may just be that the growth could come

from their slightly older counterparts.

Daily

Fantasy

Sports

Remain

Popular

Despite

Scandal,

Government

Inquiries

Methodology for analyses

and data for Leger article

on pages 16 & 18:

The survey was conducted online

with 1,004 respondents,

18 years of age or older,

among the U.S. population

from October 15th through

October 20th, 2015,

and was balanced/weighted

to statistically represent the country

by age, gender, ethnicity, and region.

Based on this sample size,

the results carry a margin of error

of approximately ± 3.1%

at the 95% confidence level.

18

// PUBLIC GAMING INTERNATIONAL // N

ovember/December 2015