|“Pollard Banknote’s Eco Scratch™ is perfect for the eco-friendly design of our Love Nature ticket. Eco Scratch™, with its natural, unrefined appearance is a fresh concept in the instant ticket world that stands out at retail,” explained Stéphane Lefebvre, Director of Product Development, Loterie Nationale. “We are proud to be among the first lotteries worldwide to launch this product. We have leveraged our exclusive partnership with Pollard Banknote to bring our players new, unique instant products.”|
|Primedice determined that a few accounts were sharing the same server seed. The game shows the player an encrypted random value, the server seed, before they bet. The player must show their own random value, the client seed. The system combines the two random values to determine win or loss. Primedice gives decrypted server seeds so there is no manipulation. This bettor, “Hufflepuff,” was betting upwards of $8,000 in bitcoin every second for hours. Hufflepuff found a way to cause the server to give out a decrypted server seed that was also an active seed. He was able to corroborate the outcomes of his bets. Hence, he wagered based on whether he would win or lose.|
Innovation does not always require strokes of visionary genius. In fact, this story illustrates how innovation is driven by an intelligent application of fundamental business practices. Like, we could ask ourselves how might we add value to our relationship with our retailers. To my mind, the key to what the Virginia Lottery did was to first ask that question without regard to how the answers will help us sell more lottery tickets. Then we circle back around to how to shape the answers to that question into win-win-win propositions that serve the Consumer, the Retailer, and the Lottery. The answer to that question in this case was that 7-Eleven wants to sell more food items. That answer led to a cross-promotional collaboration that benefits everyone. I know I should resist the impulse towards hyperbole, but I would submit that this Virginia Lottery initiative represents a major breakthrough; and points the way towards incredible opportunities to forge creative collaborations that could reshape the Lottery-Retailer relationship.
Slot machines have a challenge similar to Lottery. Young people brought up on highly engaging video games want something equally as fun and stimulating when they move into the games-of-chance world. By the middle of next year, we will begin to see a new generation of slot machines that combines elements of chance with skill. Regulations for new game-styles are being developed now. Marcus Prater, the Executive Director of the Association of Gaming Equipment Manufacturers, states "I truly believe this is the dawn of a new era for games on the casino floor".
The ongoing saga of legislators introducing bills that federalize the regulation of gambling continues. The stories in this Morning Report are self-explanatory. Let’s just hope that state governors and attorneys general will take action to prevent this usurpation of states’ rights. It is hard to imagine how these shamelessly brazen attempts to manipulate federal regulatory policy to the advantage of special interest groups (and to the detriment of charitable causes supported by Lottery) could get any traction. But miscarriage of justice has happened before, it is happening now in Europe, and so it could happen in the U.S. if nobody stands up to stop it.
It is surprising the degree to which disinformation permeates the whole dialogue about internet gambling. A few weeks ago, there was a story about how the Senior Vice President of NACS (National Association of Convenience Stores) Government Relations Lyle Beckwith asserted that there is virtually no such thing as “intrastate gambling,” as it has become simple for anyone, anywhere – and any age – to play state lottery games. He writes, in part: “States looking to put their lotteries online, for example, want to pretend that this constitutes purely intrastate gambling activity, but they’re wrong. Unlike brick and mortar casinos and convenience stores that sell lottery tickets, the Internet is accessible any time, by anyone, from anywhere. Herein lies the real states’ rights problem. Say I’m in Hawaii, a state that does not allow any gambling. But all of a sudden, I can get online — apparently no matter how old I am — and play another state’s lottery from anywhere and everywhere within Hawaii. That means the state of Hawaii has lost its ability to control what gambling goes on within its borders and its citizens can gamble from home, work, the car and even church using their choice of computer, tablet or mobile phone. The rights of Hawaii and every other state in the country to limit the gambling that can be done within its borders are completely undermined by a single state offering online lottery sales.” It is shocking that such ignorance of the facts actually sees the light of day, much less becomes position statements for an organization like NACS. Nice touch, though, trying to scare people into thinking that i-gambling is about to invade the inside of our church. The trick of it is to state your position with such certitude. Gotta respect a student of that venerable Music Man, Professor Harold Hill.
The reality is literally the opposite of the scenario portrayed by Mr. Beckwith. “Prohibition” is actually just a lack of regulation. The story It’s A Fact: Online Gambling Regulation Shuts Out Offshore Sites explains why regulated jurisdictions do a much more effective job at preventing illegality than do unregulated markets where i-gambling is theoretically “prohibited”. It’s a little paradoxical, but illegal off-shore i-gambling websites target U.S. states that “prohibit” internet gambling, and they vacate regulated markets. Illegal gambling websites that were active in Delaware, Nevada, and New Jersey, for instance, left those markets once these states implemented a structure to monitor and regulate the i-gambling industry. But they haven’t left the markets where i-gambling is “prohibited”. These illegal i-gambling operators are not deterred by “prohibition”, but they voluntarily leave jurisdictions where the industry is regulated. “Offshore sites have already shown a willingness to respectfully bow out of regulated states. It is time for new jurisdictions to take them up on that offer.”
|Texas Congressman (Republican) Joe Barton introduced a bill, HR 2888, also known as the Internet Poker Freedom Act, that if passed could regulate online poker throughout the country and allow each state the ability to decide whether or not they wish to allow the activity within its borders. This isn't the first time Barton has introduced a bill in hopes of regulating online poker. Barton introduced a bill, HR 2366, the Online Poker Act of 2011, in June 2011 cosponsored by 11 Representatives across party lines. Two years later, in July 2013, Congressman Barton tried again with the HR 2666 theInternet Poker Freedom Act of 2013.|
|Gaming regulators and slot makers are now working to change the way we see gambling, it's an idea they hope attracts more people to try their luck. Marcus Prater is the Executive Director of the Association of Gaming Equipment Manufacturers and they're all for this change. "I truly believe this is the dawn of a new era for games on the casino floor," Prater said.|
|The offshores offering sports betting in the U.S. market are not deterred in most states, but voluntarily left regulated ones, even though there is little doubt about the legality of the business. This speaks volumes about the effectiveness of regulating online gaming at the state level. The solution is simple States that have yet to regulate online gaming have two options. One is to ignore the fact that residents have access to offshore sites. This allows unlicensed sites to operate with impunity and total disregard to responsible gambling. Problem gamblers and minors are free to play at these sites. These offshore sites pay no taxes to local jurisdictions, nor do they create any jobs. The other option is to regulate the activity and deter unlicensed sites from operating in the state, while at the same time offering financial and responsible gambling protections.|
|This week, presidential candidate and Senator Lindsey Graham introduced S.1688 – a bill with a name and policy pitch that rely on a false history of U.S. gaming legislation. The bill would expand the Wire Act’s scope, which currently includes only sports betting, to include all forms of gaming. In doing so, the bill would also reverse those portions of the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 that permitted states to license and regulate online poker and other limited forms of online gaming on an intra-state basis. Thus, with this bill, Senator Graham and other legislators seek to deprive states of the ability to establish regulated gaming and compact with other like-minded states. The bill is identical to legislation introduced by House Oversight Committee chairman Jason Chaffetz in February of this year, and to a bill introduced in the Senate a year ago.|
"Ideas for Good Causes Worth
Spreading: 'Riveting talks by
remarkable people, free to the
world" brought to you by
Public Gaming Research Institute.
Our objective is to become an
invaluable resource that truly
connects the entire world to the
leaders of this industry, their
thoughts and perspectives on the
issues, and the news and background
information that gives additional
context and meaning to those
thoughts and perspectives. SMART-TECH 2015 Videos up watch below - more
to post. Up Next 'Touch Tomorrow' in Oslo, Norway. *To watch the videos below you will
click on the link and make sure
your volume is turned on.
*Copyright 2015 - these videos may
not be downloaded or uploaded to
YOUTUBE or used in any way without
the express permission of PGRI, Inc.
© PGRI, Inc. 2015 all
SMART-TECH 2015 Panel Discussion: Consideration, Chance, Prize: Is this foundational definition of gambling being circumvented by game developers and online operators? Moderator: James Maida, Co-Founder & President, Gaming Laboratories International (GLI)
SMART-TECH 2015- Panel Discussion: Reinvigorating the Draw-Games Category -Moderator: Rebecca Hargrove, Chief Executive Officer, Tennessee Education Lottery Corporation and Senior Vice President of the World Lottery Association (WLA)
SMART-TECH 2015 Panel Discussion: The New Science of Customer-Centric R & D What are the most forward-looking trends in the science of understanding -Moderator: Paula Otto, Executive Director, Virginia Lottery
SMART-TECH AWARD Presentations
SCENES from: SMART-TECH 2015 2
minute video photo collage with
2 minute video photo collage with music -Click here to watch (turn sound on)